ADRIEN ARCAND INTERVIEWED ON CBC TV IN 1962
ADRIEN ARCAND INTERVIEWÉ À CBC TV EN 1962
Comment here, and at Bitchute:
This short extract for educational purposes from a much longer interview with Adrien Arcand in 1962 contains urgent evidence that Arcand and his men, his Legionnaires of the National Unity Party of Canada were in fact innocent.
They were arrested in May and June of 1940 by the RCMP on charges the Crown never pursued before the Court, and they were never put on trial — They were not plotting the overthrow of the Canadian State as alleged by Judge Rodolphe DeSerres, proprio motu, and no such charge had ever been laid by the Crown.
The press and media laid the charge, indeed they trumped it up in headlines and false accusations going back to at least early 1938, according to newspaper clippings I retrieved at newspapers.com.
The papers were biased, the “journalists” lied, brazenly at times, fabricating even the fine details of this imaginary plot of Arcand to arm his Legionnaires with imported weapons (they had no weapons) and perpetrate a coup on the country.
Arcand should have sued the press at least at the start of 1938. I don’t know of a single law suit he ever brought against the press; but in 1938, at least, he consulted the Quebec legal authorities about a defamation suit against one paper, the one that had pretended he was importing arms from the USA.
And please note that Arcand’s party headquarters across Canada, and the homes of the leadership of the National Unity Party in every province, were all raided by the RCMP. The only thing the federal police got in these raids was personal correspondence and 6 truckloads of pamphlets, no doubt mostly The Key To The Mystery, which the left-wing was desperate to confiscate and shred.
No arms, no weapons, were ever recovered! For had that been the case, the Crown would have said so in its exhibits that it concocted, but it did not say a word!
So where is the sense of Judge Rodolphe DeSerres saying he saw a conspiracy to overthrow the Canadian State? With what? Pamphlets? Did the judge really think that Arcand and his men would confront the Canadian troops and beat them over the head with pamphlets? If the troops had read the pamphlets, it might have done them some good, though.
Without proof of arms, the allegation of a coup is farcical.
As we can see in part from the video clip above, and this is also in evidence from the early days of his Patriotic Order of the Goglus, Adrien Arcand and his Legionnaires were NOT preparing to overthrow Canada, they were training to defend Canada from the same Bolsheviks who had overthrown Russia and slaughtered the Christians there in their tens of millions.
As of 1938, together with other fascists, Arcand and his men were preparing to defend North America and the West, against a new Bolshevik “revolution” on the model of the 1917 coup in Russia during a “world civil war” these Bolsheviks were believed to be plotting.
The “world civil war” that happened was World War II. The fascists, knowing our left-wing leadership would be blindsided by the risk of another Bolshevik overthrow in the midst of this war, had long been perfecting their discipline.
In addition, we heard from the court in 1940 that Arcand was accused of planning to hold points in Montreal. Montreal? Parliament is in Ottawa. Why would Arcand overthrow Canada by taking Montreal?
The more rational explanation for the alleged intent to hold points in Montreal is that Montreal is on a direct line to New York in the USA. The Bolsheviks in 1917 boarded ships financed by the international Jewish bankers, Kuhn Loeb, from East Side New York and made their way to Russia, where they overthrew that country.
New York City is a very Jewish city with a large Jewish population. Montreal has a large Jewish population. It would be reasonable to think that since the Jewish Bolsheviks departed for Russia from New York in 1917 to carry out their coup on that country, they would launch their coup on North America in the midst of WWII from New York, but this time, no ship would be necessary. They would simply drive across the US-Canada border, and find their colleagues from the Montreal Jewish community ready to swell their ranks. That, in my view, is the kind of reasoning that might be behind Arcand’s alleged plan to hold points in Montreal.
In my view, it would be reasonable to speculate that if Arcand planned to hold points in Montreal, he was anticipating a Bolshevik invasion from New York, as had happened in WWI.
The truth that the fascists were expecting a Bolshevik attack, an attempt at a world revolution at the time of WWII, has never come out because Arcand and his men were being framed as a pretext to intern them at the demand of President Roosevelt, urged by the Jews. As with the execution of Christ in the New Testament, the Jews once again sentenced their victim while using third parties and trumped-up allegations to carry out the dirty work.
It should be noted that due to technical problems, the clip above, screen-captured from the original in segments, and pieced back together, is a bit slower and choppier than the original.
The CBC provided French subtitles of its own. I redid them because the CBC translated Arcand’s “Control of a nation by its nationals” as “control of a nation by its citizens”. That is not what “nationals” means. It is certainly not what Arcand meant. Nationals means the ethnic people who founded the nation. Pierre Trudeau, in his April 1962 issue of CITE LIBRE, uses the term “nationals” in the same sense, when referring to the “nationals” of the various third-world immigrant groups he planned to bring into Canada to give them local self-government here on the model of Confederation.
Each of these immigrant groups is composed of ethnic “nationals” from their own country of origin, the country where they form a nation. Their homeland.
The term “nationals” is far more explicit than the term “citizens”, and Arcand said “nationals”, not “citizens”. He was referring to the fact that the French-Canadians in Quebec, indeed, everywhere in Canada, are “nationals” of Canada, as are the other ethnic founding peoples of British North America. They are the ethnic founders of their nation, and of all its institutions. Their Constitution is for them; it is not for mass-imported ethnic foreigners.
I’ve written this post very quickly, without any supporting quotes, which I would prefer to include. I’m up to my ears with the redesign of this web site; and various new features, articles and posts it contains. I am also working hard to finish new ebooks, in the midst of my laptop dying rock-dead, and having to find another one on a shoe-string, to keep the project going. I bought one for a hundred bucks, it’s on the way.
I am sitting here at 1:50 a.m., surrounded by disembodied hard drives, USB cables, various editions of the Windows operating system, trying to stay afloat while my replacement laptop speeds through Canada Post from eBay.
I intend and hope to complete a post or two about the 1940 show trial, and I will discuss this important video clip again, in more detail, in the new web site.
In the meantime, I felt I’d really better give you something to keep you interested. So, you know I have not abandoned the research and book project, I am working on all of it, harder than ever.
TRANSCRIPT / TRANSCRIPTION
One must first define what the word fascism means.
Il faut d’abord définir ce que signifie le mot fascisme.
The word fascism was used in Italy.
Le mot fascisme a été utilisé en Italie.
Nazism in Germany.
Nazisme en Allemagne.
Phalangism in Spain.
Phalangisme en Espagne.
Rexism in Belgium.
Le rexisme en Belgique.
It means nationalism.
Cela signifie le nationalisme.
Control of a nation by its nationals.
Contrôle d’une nation par ses ressortissants.
You said, I think in the Spring of 1940 ―
Vous avez dit, je pense, au printemps 1940 ―
your National Unity, or perhaps could we call it the Nazi party ― would take office in Ottawa.
votre Unité nationale, ou peut-être pourrions-nous l’appeler le parti nazi ― prendrait ses fonctions à Ottawa.
Why did you believe that?
Pourquoi avez-vous cru cela ?
I was informed in 1938
J’ai été informé en 1938
whilst the civil war was raging in Spain
alors que la guerre civile faisait rage en Espagne
while there were sit-down strikes in the United States
alors qu’il y avait des grèves sur le tas aux États-Unis
and in France, under Mr. Léon Blum,
et en France, sous M. Léon Blum,
that there was to be an attempted Revolution throughout the world ―
qu’il devait y avoir une tentative de Révolution dans le monde entier ―
― world civil war in 1940.
― guerre civile mondiale en 1940.
I thought that our country, as it is, in its spirit and traditions, would overcome a leftist revolution. And we would be in power.
Je pensais que notre pays, tel qu’il est, dans son esprit et ses traditions, surmonterait une révolution de gauche et nous serions au pouvoir.
Didn’t you share many of the other views of the fascists that, uh ―
N’avez-vous pas partagé beaucoup d’autres points de vues des fascistes qui, euh ―
― Yes! Yes. To save our high culture and civilization from negations.
― Oui! Oui. Pour sauver notre haute culture et civilisation des négations.
Isn’t it true that in your writings, you ― uh, deny this kind of individualism by being against, uh, democracy, the liberal democratic state?
N’est-il pas vrai que dans vos écrits, vous euh ― vous niez ce genre d’individualisme en étant contre, euh, la démocratie, l’État démocrate libéral ?
We have not democracy. We have the party system.
Nous n’avons pas de démocratie. Nous avons le système des partis.
Democracy is the affirmation of classes.
La démocratie est l’affirmation des classes.
And the other side wants a classless society.
Et l’autre côté veut une société sans classes.
French subtitles by Adrien Arcand Books.
Sous-titres français par Adrien Arcand Books.